
Minutes
West Carrollton City Council Meeting
June 8, 1999
PRESENT: Mayor Maxine Gilman; Council Members Bill Ennis, William Gordon, Jack Jensen,
Linda Lotspaih, Donald Mounce and Jeff Sanner; City Manager G. Tracy Williams; Assistant
City Manager David Watson; Law Director Patrick Carney; Service Director Don Hill;
Director of Planning and Economic Development David Humphreys; and Assistant Clerk of
Council Patricia Replogle.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Gilman. Tracy Williams gave the invocation.
The Pledge of Allegiance and Roll Call followed.
MINUTES
A motion was made by Mr. Sanner to approve the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting
of May 25, 1999. Mr. Gordon seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken, all members
voted yes and the motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ORDINANCE NO. 3134: RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING
Ordinance No. 3134: An ordinance amending Chapter 154 of the Code of
Ordinances of West Carrollton known as the "Zoning Code", amending Section
154.184(A)(10) to prohibit the off-street parking of all recreational vehicles in the
required front yard of all residential districts.
Mr. Humphreys presented a staff report to Council. He said that this ordinance has been
recommended by the Planning Commission following numerous complaints about recreational
vehicle parking. The current ordinance states that recreational vehicles must be parked on
paved front drives, or other unpaved areas of the yard if weeds are kept cut. Mr.
Humphreys showed several slides to illustrate compliance and violations. He said that
there will be four main changes in the ordinance: eliminate parking on front paved
surface; temporary consecutive 72 hour parking within a seven day period; parking in side
or rear of residence must be on a paved surface, except for vehicles weighing 2,000 pounds
or less; and residents cannot live in recreational vehicles (cannot be connected
permanently to gas, water, etc.). Mr. Humphreys noted that it may be difficult to enforce
the temporary parking. He added that present owners of vehicles would be grandfathered
in. Mr. Ennis asked if we would consider providing off-site parking. Mr. Humphreys
responded that no joint off-site parking would be given. Mr. Mounce noted that a corner
lot would have difficulty complying. Mr. Humphreys stated that an area would have to be
paved. In response to a question from Mr. Jensen, Mr. Humphreys stated that we are more
liberal than Centerville, Kettering, and Miami Township. Miamisburg is beginning the
process but Mr. Humphreys didn't know if Springboro or Moraine has an ordinance.
Mr. Mounce asked if the grandfathering went with the property. Mr. Humphreys
replied that that is correct, as the ordinance regulates use of land, not owner. He said
that parking may be allowed between houses if both property owners agreed, and the vehicle
conformed to the size allowance. He also responded that utility trailers, such as the work
trailers Mr. Gordon inquired about, would be under the regulations. Mr. Gordon also stated
that he is opposed to having to pay to store the vehicles. Mr. Humphreys said that the
Planning Commission felt that if the owner could afford to pay for the vehicle and
license, he/she could afford to pay for storage. Mr. Sanner noted that many people use
their RV's, particularly boats, three to four times a week. Mr. Humphreys said that most
of those would be under the 2,000 pound exemption. Mr. Sanner asked if people complained
about pickup trucks, would we outlaw them? Mr. Gordon said that there had been complaints
about on-street parking and now it seems it has expanded to include all RV's. Mr. Humphrey
said that the Planning Commission recognized that there would be debate regarding the
ordinance. Mr. Mounce said that he was glad that the Planning Commission submitted one
complete study instead of several areas over time. Mayor Gilman said that many communities
prohibit on-street parking. Mrs. Lotspaih asked if a permit is needed for company
vehicles, to which Mr. Humphreys responded no. Mr. Jensen suggested that one way to
monitor those to be grandfathered in, would be to have a registration period for
approximately six months, and those owners would be grandfathered in. Mr.
Humphreys said that could be done, but the title would only show the vehicle was owned and
not if it was stored at the residence. He said that if the vehicle was not stored at the
property, they would lose the provision to grandfather in.
Mr. Humphreys said that the regulations are for the use of land, and if not used over a
twelve month period, they would lose the grandfathering. Mr. Mounce asked how
long it would have to be used over a twelve month period. Mr. Sanner asked if bringing the
vehicle back for one day per year would be allowed. Mr. Jensen said that some of the
photographs in the Council packet portrayed dangerous situations. Mr. Humphreys said that
there are concerns with the larger RV's and that they can write a separate ordinance for
safety concerns.
Ray Horn, 917 Primrose Drive, addressed Council. He asked if any of the Planning
Commission members owned RV's and Mr. Humphreys said that some do. Mr. Horn said that this
ordinance will be a hardship on RV owners and having a paved driveway will also be a
hardship. Mr. Humphreys noted that anything that meets the current regulations would be grandfathered
in if used within twelve months.
Noah Pence, 765 Cransberry Drive, spoke to Council. He asked about trailers being
commercial vehicles. Mr. Humphreys said that under the current regulations, motorized
vehicles must be of a certain size and weight, and all trailers are considered utility
trailers even if not used for recreation. Mr. Humphrey also said that the 2,000 pounds
refers to the vehicle as it comes from the factory. Mr. Pence expressed concern over the grandfathering
as the City will grow and future residents may have or want RV's.
Bill Marsh, 1148 Alex Road, addressed Council. He said that the 72 hour minimum is
inadequate for temporary parking. When they bought their vehicle, it took longer than that
to get it ready. He also felt that there should be no weight limit. It should either be
allowed or not allowed. He asked for clarification of gas, as used in the restriction of
permanent connections. He also questioned use of RV's for overnight camping. Mr. Marsh
said that he doesn't see the need for any changes to the ordinance and added that RV
people should be involved in creating a new ordinance. Mr. Mounce asked if he would be
interested in assisting. Mr. Marsh responded that he would, except on Thursday evenings.
Dave Layne, 259 Cosmos Drive, addressed Council. He said that he has a corner lot and a
20' by 50' pad for RV parking. He asked what he could use it for if not for RV parking. He
was informed that he would be grandfathered in as long as he used it at least
once a year. Mr. Jensen said the grandfathering would be permanent. Mr. Layne
said storage is expensive. Mr. Gordon noted that any new owner of the property would have
to have an RV within twelve months.
Jim Freeman, 317 Ellenwood Drive, asked what would happen if he went on a trip for three
or four months. He was told that he would not lose the grandfather stipulation if
he used the vehicle within twelve months. Mr. Freeman said that he feels he should have
the right to park his RV where he wants on his property.
Julie Ziemkowski, 323 Ridgecrest, gave to Council pictures of an RV owned by her neighbors
which is parked beside the house. She said that she is concerned about the safety of
having the vehicle there as the land is not structurally sound and if it fell over, it
could hit their gas line. She asked that RV owners be sensitive to non-RV owners. She also
asked if a privacy fence is allowed. Mr. Humphreys said that Mrs. Ziemkowski has the right
to protect her property. Although the RV in the photograph is not in violation of the
current regulations, if it is leaning on her property, she has the right to ask to have it
moved.
Bill McAllister, 327 Ridgecrest, addressed Council. He said that it is his vehicle in
those photographs. He said that the vehicle is on his property and is parked there to keep
from being an eyesore. He said that the ground is hard clay and the vehicle is not in
danger of falling. He said that the RV will not be left like that, adding that the area
will be graveled and eventually paved.
Don Trusty, 341 Diana Drive, addressed Council. He said that he has RV'd for over
twenty-five years and likes the convenience of having his RV at his home. He doesn't like
storing it. He said that RV people are the best people in the world. He doesn't want to
see future generations stripped of this right because they can't afford to comply with
these regulations. He said that in response to complaints he did some work on his parking
pad to make it look nice. He said that he doesn't complain about his neighbors and the
ones that do complain will complain about anything as they are unhappy or angry about
something else.
Ellen McAllister, 327 Ridgecrest, spoke to Council. She said she was surprised to hear
about the complaint from the Ziemkowskis. She thought they were doing the right thing in
moving the RV to the side of the house. She said communication is very important.
Dave Layne, 259 Cosmos Drive, addressed Council again. He said that the new RV's that are
coming out are 109" wide and bass boats are also being enlarged. He said they are
legal on Ohio roads and Council should keep this in mind.
John Mossbarger, 769 Cransberry Drive, informed the clerk that he wished to go on record
as being opposed to Ordinance 3134 but did not wish to address Council at this time.
This is the First Reading of Ordinance No. 3134.
ORDINANCE NO. 3135 - STANDARD FOR EASEMENT PROHIBITION REGULATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
COMMENTS BY THE AUDIENCE
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
ORDINANCE NO. 3131: CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
OF CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES
ORDINANCE NO. 3132: DUTIES AND ROLE OF BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
AND CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES
Ordinance No. 3132: An ordinance amending Chapter 154 of the Code of
Ordinances of West Carrollton known as the "Zoning Code", amending Section
154.12(C)(3), duties and role of the Board of Zoning Appeals, and Section 154.181(A)(1),
conditions for approval of conditionally permitted uses to establish a more specific set
of findings that the Board of Zoning Appeals will use when reviewing all Conditional Use
Permit applications
A motion was made by Mr. Mounce, seconded by Mr. Jensen, to approve
Ordinance No. 3132. A roll call vote was taken: Mr. Ennis-yes; Mr. Gordon-no; Mr.
Jensen-yes; Mrs. Lotspaih-yes; Mr. Mounce-yes; Mr. Sanner-no; Mayor Gilman-yes.
The motion carried by majority vote.
ORDINANCE NO 3133: CLARIFY APPROPRIATE COMPATIBLE
AND SUPPLEMENTARY O OR B-1 USES IN M-1, INDUSTRIAL PARK
Ordinance No. 3133: An ordinance amending Chapter 154 of the
Code Ordinances of West Carrollton known as the "Zoning Code", amending Section
154.29(C), conditionally permitted uses to clarify the appropriate compatible and
supplementary O and B-1 uses in the M-1, Industrial Park.
Mr. Jensen made a motion, seconded by Mrs. Lotspaih, to approve Ordinance No. 3133.
All members voted yes to a roll call vote and the motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
RESOLUTION NO. 14-99: MIAMI VALLEY RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
WORKER'S COMPENSATION GROUP RATING PLAN FOR 2000
Mayor Gilman, citing Mr. Williams' report, said that the savings in 1998
were $8300, and $23,000 is the projected savings for 1999 due to participation in this
program.
Mr. Gordon introduced and made a motion to approve Resolution No. 14-99. Mr. Ennis
seconded the motion. A unanimous roll call vote carried the motion.
REPORTS BY OFFICERS
UNSCHEDULED BUSINESS
COMMENTS BY THE AUDIENCE
Robert Trubee, 40 East Main Street, addressed Council. He said that he had
received a ticket for parking in a yellow marked area by his home. He said that there is
no parking available there, and that they were told that it would not be a problem. He
said that if it they had known that it was, they would not have bought the place. He said
he didn't know what the solution would be but he wanted to bring it to Council's
attention. The Mayor said she always wondered where the owners parked and asked Mr.
Williams to check into the matter.
COMMENTS BY THE COUNCIL
Mr. Ennis, Mr. Jensen and Mr. Sanner said that they
appreciated the attendance at the Public Hearing.
Mr. Mounce said that the Paper Festival is next weekend.
Mr. Gordon congratulated the Mayor on her induction into the West Carrollton Schools
Distinguished Hall of Fame. He also informed everyone of the events that will be a part of
the Paper Festival.
Mayor Gilman congratulated the new businesses in West Carrollton: Signs Now, the Mahara
Banquet Center and the Hammelmann Corporation. The Mayor thanked Ron and Julie Ziemkowski
on cameras.
RECESS
EXECUTIVE SESSION
WORK SESSION
FIRE STATION IMPROVEMENTS
Following this discussion, architect Gary Snyder stated that he would
prepare revised cost estimates and have them ready to distribute with the next City
Council packet for further discussion at the next meeting.
Chief Keister, Tom Reilly, Don Hill, David Humphreys, and Gary Snyder left
the meeting.
City Council agreed to postpone discussion on the other two items on the work
session agenda regarding Enterprise Zones and the action items from the annual vision
retreat.
COMMENTS BY COUNCIL
Councilmember Don Mounce requested that City Council consider a resolution
supporting the proposed construction of S.R. 892, and also that consideration should be
given to possibly hiring a full-time Humane Officer due to difficulties in retaining a
part-time Humane Officer.
Mayor Gilman suggested that a Citizens Focus Group possibly be formed to
review in greater detail the proposed ordinance regulating parking of recreational
vehicles on private property.
A motion to adjourn the meeting was made by Councilmember Mounce and seconded by
Councilmember Linda Lotspaih. All those present voting in favor, the meeting was
adjourned.
_________________________ _________________________
MAYOR CLERK OF COUNCIL